R
Ralphey at mtgmelb.com
Guest
At 06:22 PM 2/11/2004, Jim Beszhak wrote:
>So I'm asking what the folks that will be using this data file might think.
>I'm quite frankly leaning towards just tagging those 18 cards as foils
>within the Shadows set, (I could put the collectors info for the foils in
>the notes section.) but I can honestly see where real hardcore collectors
>would like to see the original collectors info as a card in itself.
How about creating a second set "Shadow-Foil", with the info in that?
R.
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
$9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/WuQolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
>So I'm asking what the folks that will be using this data file might think.
>I'm quite frankly leaning towards just tagging those 18 cards as foils
>within the Shadows set, (I could put the collectors info for the foils in
>the notes section.) but I can honestly see where real hardcore collectors
>would like to see the original collectors info as a card in itself.
How about creating a second set "Shadow-Foil", with the info in that?
R.
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
$9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/WuQolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->