Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Is the intention that the "disp" attribute will at some point have a no
display option as well as its current "noprint"? If so, what is the possible time line(a near or long term addition)? __________________________________________________ _______________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> FREE COLLEGE MONEY CLICK HERE to search 600,000 scholarships! http://us.click.yahoo.com/47cccB/4m7...SFAA/IMSolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
--- In armybuilder@y..., "Woodrow Walton" <woodywalton@h...> wrote:
> Is the intention that the "disp" attribute will at some point have > a no display option as well as its current "noprint"? If so, what > is the possible time line(a near or long term addition)? > If you dont want to see a unit, use the external Unit attribute "hide". Am I misunderstanding what you're trying to do? Cheers, Russell. ---- Russell Sparkes - rjs@inorbit.com - http://www.freecfm.com/r/rjs "Experience is what you get just after you needed it" - Unknown ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Get your FREE credit report with a FREE CreditCheck Monitoring Service trial http://us.click.yahoo.com/MDsVHB/bQ8...SFAA/IMSolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am wanting to hide a child unit thats only purpose is to divert cost from
the parents comp group using the forc attribute. It doesn't need to be visible. >From: "Russell Sparkes" <rjs@inorbit.com> >Reply-To: armybuilder@yahoogroups.com >To: armybuilder@yahoogroups.com >Subject: [AB] Re: "Disp" attribute future? >Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 23:20:56 -0000 > >--- In armybuilder@y..., "Woodrow Walton" <woodywalton@h...> wrote: > > Is the intention that the "disp" attribute will at some point have > > a no display option as well as its current "noprint"? If so, what > > is the possible time line(a near or long term addition)? > > > >If you dont want to see a unit, use the external Unit >attribute "hide". Am I misunderstanding what you're trying to do? > >Cheers, >Russell. >---- >Russell Sparkes - rjs@inorbit.com - http://www.freecfm.com/r/rjs >"Experience is what you get just after you needed it" - Unknown > > __________________________________________________ _______________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Get your FREE credit report with a FREE CreditCheck Monitoring Service trial http://us.click.yahoo.com/MDsVHB/bQ8...SFAA/IMSolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> |
#3 |
Senior Member
Lone Wolf Staff
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 8,232
|
I considered adding that ability to "disp" when I first implemented it, but
it was a fair bit of work to do that and I couldn't think of a good way that anyone could put it to use. So I dropped it. It's definitely a possibility for the future, but I'll need to hear a good way to utilize it. :-) Also, my current focus is on a new product idea before returning back to do another release of AB, so a significant new feature release of AB is not going to happen real soon. There will likely be a V2.3 in before the end of the year that adds a few things, but nothing major. Thanks, Rob At 04:41 PM 9/25/2001 -0500, you wrote: >Is the intention that the "disp" attribute will at some point have a no >display option as well as its current "noprint"? If so, what is the >possible time line(a near or long term addition)? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rob Bowes (rob@wolflair.com) (650) 726-9689 Lone Wolf Development www.wolflair.com ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Get your FREE credit report with a FREE CreditCheck Monitoring Service trial http://us.click.yahoo.com/MDsVHB/bQ8...SFAA/IMSolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> |
#4 |
Senior Member
Lone Wolf Staff
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 8,232
|
So you don't want a "disp" that allows print-only units, you want a "disp"
that completely hides the unit from the user. It that correct? That's an interesting idea. I *CAN* envision a few uses for that. I'll put it on the todo list, but I'm not sure how much work is involved, so no promises. :-) Thanks, Rob At 09:51 PM 9/25/2001 -0500, you wrote: >I am wanting to hide a child unit thats only purpose is to divert cost from >the parents comp group using the forc attribute. It doesn't need to be >visible. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rob Bowes (rob@wolflair.com) (650) 726-9689 Lone Wolf Development www.wolflair.com ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help? Donate cash, emergency relief information http://us.click.yahoo.com/d49MCB/3WD...SFAA/IMSolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> |
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
correct! This is in regards to the discussion about item cost being rolled
into parent, see your message 4940. Thanks! Woody >From: Rob Bowes <rob@wolflair.com> >Reply-To: armybuilder@yahoogroups.com >To: armybuilder@yahoogroups.com >Subject: Re: [AB] Re: "Disp" attribute future? >Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 21:21:02 -0700 > >So you don't want a "disp" that allows print-only units, you want a "disp" >that completely hides the unit from the user. It that correct? > >That's an interesting idea. I *CAN* envision a few uses for that. I'll put >it on the todo list, but I'm not sure how much work is involved, so no >promises. :-) > >Thanks, Rob > > >At 09:51 PM 9/25/2001 -0500, you wrote: > >I am wanting to hide a child unit thats only purpose is to divert cost >from > >the parents comp group using the forc attribute. It doesn't need to be > >visible. > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Rob Bowes (rob@wolflair.com) (650) 726-9689 >Lone Wolf Development www.wolflair.com > __________________________________________________ _______________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Get your FREE credit report with a FREE CreditCheck Monitoring Service trial http://us.click.yahoo.com/MDsVHB/bQ8...SFAA/IMSolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> |
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
--- In armybuilder@y..., "Woodrow Walton" <woodywalton@h...> wrote:
> I am wanting to hide a child unit thats only purpose is to divert > cost from the parents comp group using the forc attribute. It > doesn't need to be visible. Ah now I understand - hide isn't for you. Time to defer to Rob on this one :-) Perhaps there's another way of achieving what you want? Cheers, Russell. ---- Russell Sparkes - rjs@inorbit.com - http://www.freecfm.com/r/rjs "Experience is what you get just after you needed it" - Unknown ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> FREE COLLEGE MONEY CLICK HERE to search 600,000 scholarships! http://us.click.yahoo.com/ujOgTC/4m7...SFAA/IMSolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> |
#7 |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
d20 Modern/Future? | violatre | Hero Lab Discussion | 6 | December 30th, 2008 03:23 PM |
Desires for AB 3.0 in the future | dan_g_miner at yahoo.com | Army Builder | 0 | January 11th, 2005 11:06 AM |
Future of Army Builder? | tcolonna at hotmail.com | Army Builder | 34 | April 13th, 2003 09:27 PM |
zfut and future abilities | graham.tracey at lscfn.ca | Army Builder | 0 | July 23rd, 2002 04:10 PM |
Possible Idea for future AB | freds67 at aol.com | Army Builder | 1 | December 5th, 2000 03:14 PM |