Lone Wolf Development Forums  

Go Back   Lone Wolf Development Forums > Army Builder Forums > Army Builder
Register FAQ Community Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
ThinkLibertarian at aol.c
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Old October 31st, 2001, 10:36 AM
I hacked together a file for D&D Chainmail. It's the first time I've created an AB file from scratch.

I guess my first question is, is anyone else doing one? I'd hate to duplicate our efforts.

Anyway, I have a question:

Ranged Attack (RAtt) is a signed stat, but it does not apply to all models, so I set 0.0=-. Unfortunately, when there's a zero in the stat, it is displaying +0 instead of -.

Here's the line from the data definition file:

RAtt | 4 | 0 | 0.0=- | 99.0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | . | . | .

Is there a workaround?

Thanks,
Rich


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Clever Cam is a pen sized digital camera, webcam, and mini-camcorder. Just $79.95 at Youcansave.com.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/F11sED/NkN...SFAA/IMSolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
  #1 Reply With Quote
rob
Senior Member
Lone Wolf Staff
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 8,232

Old November 5th, 2001, 05:15 PM
I haven't tried this, but I *THINK* that the issue is you are specifying a
value of "2" for the "signed" field in the definition file. A value of 2
forces a "+" to be prepended to the stat value if it is zero, which
overrides the mapping of a zero value to "-". If you switch to a value of
"1", I believe you will get the proper behavior. If not, it may be a bug
that I need to fix, in which case please send me the files and I'll look at
it myself.

Thanks, Rob


At 02:29 PM 10/31/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>I hacked together a file for D&D Chainmail. It's the first time I've
>created an AB file from scratch.
>
>I guess my first question is, is anyone else doing one? I'd hate to
>duplicate our efforts.
>
>Anyway, I have a question:
>
>Ranged Attack (RAtt) is a signed stat, but it does not apply to all
>models, so I set 0.0=-. Unfortunately, when there's a zero in the stat,
>it is displaying +0 instead of -.
>
>Here's the line from the data definition file:
>
> RAtt | 4 | 0 | 0.0=- | 99.0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | . | . | .
>
>Is there a workaround?
>
>Thanks,
>Rich


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rob Bowes (rob@wolflair.com) (650) 726-9689
Lone Wolf Development www.wolflair.com


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Universal Inkjet Refill Kit $29.95
Refill any ink cartridge for less!
Includes black and color ink.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/E11sED/MkN...SFAA/IMSolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
rob is offline   #2 Reply With Quote
ThinkLibertarian at aol.c
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Old November 6th, 2001, 01:09 PM
I tried 1 instead of 2 and it gives the same result: +0.

I'll email you the files directly.

Thanks,
Rich

--- In armybuilder@y..., Rob Bowes <rob@w...> wrote:
> I haven't tried this, but I *THINK* that the issue is you are
specifying a
> value of "2" for the "signed" field in the definition file. A value
of 2
> forces a "+" to be prepended to the stat value if it is zero, which
> overrides the mapping of a zero value to "-". If you switch to a
value of
> "1", I believe you will get the proper behavior. If not, it may be
a bug
> that I need to fix, in which case please send me the files and I'll
look at
> it myself.
>
> Thanks, Rob
>
>
> At 02:29 PM 10/31/2001 -0500, you wrote:
> >I hacked together a file for D&D Chainmail. It's the first time
I've
> >created an AB file from scratch.
> >
> >I guess my first question is, is anyone else doing one? I'd hate
to
> >duplicate our efforts.
> >
> >Anyway, I have a question:
> >
> >Ranged Attack (RAtt) is a signed stat, but it does not apply to
all
> >models, so I set 0.0=-. Unfortunately, when there's a zero in the
stat,
> >it is displaying +0 instead of -.
> >
> >Here's the line from the data definition file:
> >
> > RAtt | 4 | 0 | 0.0=- | 99.0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | .
| . | .
> >
> >Is there a workaround?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Rich
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
> Rob Bowes (rob@w...) (650) 726-9689
> Lone Wolf Development
www.wolflair.com
  #3 Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Chainmail fotto at bellsouth.net Army Builder 0 September 28th, 2002 02:15 PM
[ab-files] New Chainmail data files ThinkLibertarian at aol.c Army Builder 0 February 24th, 2002 07:48 PM
Chainmail Files posted to ab-files ThinkLibertarian at aol.c Army Builder 0 December 30th, 2001 08:13 PM
Chainmail? fotto at bellsouth.net Army Builder 3 October 20th, 2001 06:58 PM
Some more file errors with 40k Gamma II file jeffrey.m.freeman at gte. Army Builder 2 November 22nd, 2000 04:31 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
wolflair.com copyright ©1998-2016 Lone Wolf Development, Inc. View our Privacy Policy here.