|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 1,458
|
I tried reviving my Numenera project. I started adding weapons. I figured I'd clean up some of the fields that don't seem to be needed in Numenera. Aaaaand that was a mistake.
I had to edit eleven files just to get to a point where I had no more errors. I wasn't expecting that, and as I was going, I was mainly just commenting things out in case I made any errors. I wasn't really fixing things as I want. I just wanted to get to a point where I had no more errors. Now, if I want things to actually work properly, I have to go through all eleven of those files and fix things according to what fields I eliminated, and I'm not sure I'm up for that. I wish I'd made a backup before making extensive edits. I've lost my motivation again. Anyone else have a working Numenera system they'd be willing to share? |
#1 |
Senior Member
Volunteer Data File Contributor
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,502
|
Oof... no luck here. Have you considered using Source Control? I use Github to back up the system I'm working on. It's saved my bacon once or twice.
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 1,458
|
Quote:
Even if I was using github, I still would have had to commit changes. I'm the weakest link in the chain here, not the method. :-( |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Volunteer Data File Contributor
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,502
|
Hah... I know how that is. Particularly given the general philosophy of "Don't commit until you have something functional", which means I might have changes sitting for weeks...
|
#4 |
|
|