Digest Number 810

To unsubscribe from this group, email

armybuilder-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------

There are 3 messages in this issue.

Topics in this digest:

1. 40k Imperial Guard Wargear error
From: "Alex Roberts" <robertal@campbellhall.org>
2. Re: 40k Imperial Guard Wargear error
From: "Jimi" <jimi@tubman.fsbusiness.co.uk>
3. Re: 40k Imperial Guard Wargear error
From: ImhotepTheArchitect <imhotepthearchitect@yahoo.com>


__________________________________________________ ______________________
__________________________________________________ ______________________

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2003 12:35:38 -0800
From: "Alex Roberts" <robertal@campbellhall.org>
Subject: 40k Imperial Guard Wargear error

Hi,
I hope this is the right place to note this sort of thing. I've
noticed that there is a small omission on the Imperial Guard list
com-linnk wargear. The army builder file notes the following.

"If the command hq has a comm-link, one squad per turn that also has a
comm-link can, at any time, use the hw's leadership instead of its own."

However, the wargear description from the book notes the following.

Pg 8

"If a commmand HQ or command section has a comm-link, then one squad per
turn that also has a comm-link may use the leadership value of the
officer, no matter where on the battlefield they are located."

I know it may seem like a minor distinction, but it is actually
important, as it allows command section to provide leadership as well as
the command hq outside of 12". It's not really a huge deal for those
who have a codex, but if the kind fellow who does the warhammer 40k file
updates could correct it whenever there's a free opportunity that would
be awesome for those who don't check against the book. Thanks!

Best Regards,
Alex


__________________________________________________ ______________________
__________________________________________________ ______________________

Message: 2
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2003 21:18:11 -0000
From: "Jimi" <jimi@tubman.fsbusiness.co.uk>
Subject: Re: 40k Imperial Guard Wargear error

> It's not really a huge deal for those who have a codex,

Which is what you should be doing anyway.


Jimi




__________________________________________________ ______________________
__________________________________________________ ______________________

Message: 3
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2003 13:14:10 -0800 (PST)
From: ImhotepTheArchitect <imhotepthearchitect@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: 40k Imperial Guard Wargear error


The datafiles were never meant to replace the need for a codex, and are vaguely worded in many areas intentionally for that effect. We do not wish to have our work construed as an attempt to assists people in playing 40k without purschasing the proper codex for their army.
Cheers,

Alex Roberts <robertal@campbellhall.org> wrote:It's not really a huge deal for those who have a codex, but if the kind fellow who does the warhammer 40k file updates could correct it whenever there's a free opportunity that would be awesome for those who don't check against the book. Thanks!


--
Graham H. Tracey (40k3 Maintainer)
If we can't fix it, then it ain't broke!
40k3 Datafile Support Group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ab-40k3
40k3 Datafiles Bug Tracker: http://bugtrack.lscfn.ca





---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



__________________________________________________ ______________________
__________________________________________________ ______________________



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/