Lone Wolf Development Forums  

Go Back   Lone Wolf Development Forums > Card Vault Forums > Card Vault

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
rob
Senior Member
Lone Wolf Staff
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 8,232

Old October 10th, 2003, 11:46 PM
Adding user-defined qualities is on the todo list, but there is a big
potential pitfall with doing it, hence the delay thus far. The problem is
that we've developed the exchange file mechanism in anticipation of the
partner mechanism being utilized by trading sites. Once those start to come
online, user-defined quality ratings will make it impossible to effect
trades using those ratings. To support trades through online sites, a
standardized set of quality ratings is necessitated. Given this, do you
have any recommendations for how you'd like to see things handled from the
user perspective???

I've now added to the todo list the feature for user-defined notes on cards
in the inventory.

-Rob

At 08:44 AM 10/10/2003 +1000, you wrote:
>At 06:22 AM 10/10/2003, you wrote:
> > >I'd personally prefer not to add these cards to my "owned" until they
> > >actually arrive, however I'd like them able to be included...and I'd also
> > >*love* to be able to note whom the transit cards were coming from.
> >
> >You could add those as 'Reserved' quality, then, when they arrive, move
> >them from Reserved to Mint (or whatever quality they actually happen to be).
>
>But Reserved doesn't appear in the quality summary window, meaning I
>wouldn't know that they were coming when I checked inventory.
>
>Obviously using reserved isn't the best option, but another quality might be.
>
>Which brings me to another "request" - could qualities be user defined?
>Rather than unknown, poor, good, fine... if I could change the text to suit
>myself, or even better yet, add my own "quality" values, then that would be
>great!
>
> >Adding notes to cards in the inventory would be more difficult to do, and
> >isn't currently possible. I'll ask Rob to put it on the to do list.
>
>That would be great too
>
>Thanks for your help, as always!
>
>R.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rob Bowes (rob@wolflair.com) (559) 658-6995
Lone Wolf Development www.wolflair.com


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3ex...sNAA/WuQolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
rob is offline   #11 Reply With Quote
rob
Senior Member
Lone Wolf Staff
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 8,232

Old October 11th, 2003, 12:12 AM
Just to add to what Colen said, the two new qualities were critical
additions for even more reasons. The reserved quality is needed to allow
users to build decks with those cards EXCLUDED from availability during
deck construction. The electronic quality is needed so that users can use
inventory validation of decks against just the electronic card inventory,
exclusive of any physical cards owned. These are in addition to the points
that Colen identified.

User qualities may be useful, but they undermine any formal exchange of
trade/want lists. I'm anxious to hear what folks have in mind for this (see
my previous post on the subject).

Thanks, Rob

At 04:34 PM 10/9/2003 -0700, you wrote:
>At 03:52 PM 10/9/2003, you wrote:
> > >>>Which brings me to another "request" - could qualities be user defined?
> >Rather than unknown, poor, good, fine... if I could change the text to suit
> >myself, or even better yet, add my own "quality" values, then that would be
> >great!
> >
> >I think this would be a good idea. Whenever someone wants to track
> >something you haven't thought of through inventory, you guys always tell
> >them to use an alternate quality. This makes sense and all, but with the
> >ability to make a new quality based on whatever the new thing is they want
> >to track, things would be much simpler, and there wouldn't be new
> >qualities needing to be added to (like electronic quality) The new
> >qualities the user would define should be game-system based though and not
> >used across all game systems.
>
>I believe this is already on the to-do list. However, the new qualities
>were needed, even if that feature had been added in 1.3. Why? Let's say
>that two people want to record their electronic cards, and one of them
>creates a new category of "electronic". The other creates a new category of
>"computar", perhaps because they can't spell. The addition of an extra
>Electronic quality makes it as easy as it ever was to record and trade
>electronic cards.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rob Bowes (rob@wolflair.com) (559) 658-6995
Lone Wolf Development www.wolflair.com


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Rent DVDs Online - Over 14,500 titles.
No Late Fees & Free Shipping.
Try Netflix for FREE!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/JYdFFC/XP....SFAA/WuQolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
rob is offline   #12 Reply With Quote
Ralphey at mtgmelb.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Old October 11th, 2003, 12:17 AM
At 05:50 PM 11/10/2003, Rob Bowes wrote:
>To support trades through online sites, a
>standardized set of quality ratings is necessitated. Given this, do you
>have any recommendations for how you'd like to see things handled from the
>user perspective???

For the purposes of trading I personally would use stardard ratings for my
haves and wants. The personalised
ratings would cover such things as signed cards (where these weren't
supported by the data file author as standard).
I'd also use it to track my collection (at present), because the Reserved
quality doesn't show up when looking at
the quality summary, meaning I can't tell at a glance where my collection &
play set is at.

I see the personalised ratings as handling things that only I care about,
although it would be *extremely* handy
if personalised ratings could be treated as a subset of another rating if
desired. Eg. I have 4 mint Black Lotus,
of which 2 are signed and 2 are unsigned.

I guess this comes back to my previous request for the ability to view data
in summary fashion and be able
to break it down by definable categories as desired

R.


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Rent DVDs Online - Over 14,500 titles.
No Late Fees & Free Shipping.
Try Netflix for FREE!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/JYdFFC/XP....SFAA/WuQolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
  #13 Reply With Quote
rob
Senior Member
Lone Wolf Staff
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 8,232

Old October 11th, 2003, 12:27 AM
I didn't think anyone would want to view the Reserved cards in the summary
window, so I intentionally didn't add it. We can easily add that into a
V1.3a update. There are a few bugs that folks have reported that need
fixing, and we can simply consider that an "oversight" bug. :-)

-Rob

At 06:17 PM 10/11/2003 +1000, you wrote:
>At 05:50 PM 11/10/2003, Rob Bowes wrote:
> >To support trades through online sites, a
> >standardized set of quality ratings is necessitated. Given this, do you
> >have any recommendations for how you'd like to see things handled from the
> >user perspective???
>
>For the purposes of trading I personally would use stardard ratings for my
>haves and wants. The personalised
>ratings would cover such things as signed cards (where these weren't
>supported by the data file author as standard).
>I'd also use it to track my collection (at present), because the Reserved
>quality doesn't show up when looking at
>the quality summary, meaning I can't tell at a glance where my collection &
>play set is at.
>
>I see the personalised ratings as handling things that only I care about,
>although it would be *extremely* handy
>if personalised ratings could be treated as a subset of another rating if
>desired. Eg. I have 4 mint Black Lotus,
>of which 2 are signed and 2 are unsigned.
>
>I guess this comes back to my previous request for the ability to view data
>in summary fashion and be able
>to break it down by definable categories as desired
>
>R.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rob Bowes (rob@wolflair.com) (559) 658-6995
Lone Wolf Development www.wolflair.com


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Rent DVDs from home.
Over 14,500 titles. Free Shipping
& No Late Fees. Try Netflix for FREE!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/ArdFIC/hP....SFAA/WuQolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
rob is offline   #14 Reply With Quote
Ralphey at mtgmelb.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Old October 11th, 2003, 12:30 AM
At 06:16 PM 11/10/2003, Rob Bowes wrote:
>The reserved quality is needed to allow
>users to build decks with those cards EXCLUDED from availability during
>deck construction.

Hmmm, then I've been misusing it, because I will use cards from my
collection in deck building IF NECESSARY, but my preference is not to.

>User qualities may be useful, but they undermine any formal exchange of
>trade/want lists.

If they are personalised subsets of the major data then that shouldn't
cause any grief?

R.


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Rent DVDs from home.
Over 14,500 titles. Free Shipping
& No Late Fees. Try Netflix for FREE!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/ArdFIC/hP....SFAA/WuQolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
  #15 Reply With Quote
Ralphey at mtgmelb.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Old October 11th, 2003, 12:32 AM
At 05:34 PM 11/10/2003, Rob Bowes wrote:
>That sounds like it might be useful. :-)

I am available for hire...

>FYI: The things that also get added first are the things that we think are
>most useful to the widest number of users, along with those things that
>users ask for the most.

So if I ask for something frequently does that count?

R.


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3ex...sNAA/WuQolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
  #16 Reply With Quote
rob
Senior Member
Lone Wolf Staff
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 8,232

Old October 11th, 2003, 12:52 AM
At 06:31 PM 10/11/2003 +1000, you wrote:
>At 06:16 PM 11/10/2003, Rob Bowes wrote:
> >The reserved quality is needed to allow
> >users to build decks with those cards EXCLUDED from availability during
> >deck construction.
>
>Hmmm, then I've been misusing it, because I will use cards from my
>collection in deck building IF NECESSARY, but my preference is not to.

I don't think you're using the quality rating incorrectly. The goal is to
build a deck that doesn't use the reserved cards. So validation flags any
shortages with reserved cards excluded. If you really need to build a given
deck using reserved cards, you can quickly check the reserved quantity to
make sure you're covered.

FYI. Of the various proponents of this feature, reserved cards were always
characterized as "off limits" for use in deck construction. At no time did
anyone mention that they will actually use reserved cards if necessary. So
I thought it was an absolute instead of a preference to avoid using those
cards. Hence the design as you see it today.... :-(

And yes, I'm now adding to the todo list the ability to toggle whether
reserved cards are/aren't included in inventory validation numbers. This
would allow you to toggle it as needed to instantly check if you have the
cards to build a deck with or without having to dip into the reserved cards.

> >User qualities may be useful, but they undermine any formal exchange of
> >trade/want lists.
>
>If they are personalised subsets of the major data then that shouldn't
>cause any grief?

Well, if they are simply subsets, then you are correct. Until this moment,
custom quality ratings have never been characterized as subsets, hence my
concern. However, if they are treated as subsets, then it introduces some
additional wrinkles. How does CV help the user police these subsets for
accuracy and consistency. For example, let's say a user creates a custom
quality rating named "signed" for tracking signed cards, regardless of
physical quality. So now that user has 3 signed copies of card XYZ, one of
which is Good quality and the others Mint. Should CV simply ignore those 3
copies of the custom quality? Does CV need to verify that number complies
with some other criteria? How confusing will it be for users to have some
numbers that are totalled and tracked, while others are not?

I don't know the answers to these questions, and I'm sure there will be
many more as soon as the issue starts being really thought through. I'm
just posing a few of the factors that come to mind that will need to be
considered and addressed in trying to implement an appropriate solution. :-)

-Rob

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rob Bowes (rob@wolflair.com) (559) 658-6995
Lone Wolf Development www.wolflair.com


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3ex...sNAA/WuQolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
rob is offline   #17 Reply With Quote
rob
Senior Member
Lone Wolf Staff
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 8,232

Old October 11th, 2003, 12:59 AM
At 06:33 PM 10/11/2003 +1000, you wrote:
>At 05:34 PM 11/10/2003, Rob Bowes wrote:
> >That sounds like it might be useful. :-)
>
>I am available for hire...

Are you willing to work for peanuts? You'll have to shell them yourself, of
course. :-)

> >FYI: The things that also get added first are the things that we think are
> >most useful to the widest number of users, along with those things that
> >users ask for the most.
>
>So if I ask for something frequently does that count?

No. I'm pretty aware of who is asking for what features. You are welcome to
lobby for something you think is valuable and encourage others to chime in
if they agree. But if they don't voice their agreement, then your
suggestion is more visible as lacking the extra votes, and that calls
attention to it being not as valuable a feature as we might otherwise deem
it. So pick your features and lobby for them if you wish.... :-)

-Rob

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rob Bowes (rob@wolflair.com) (559) 658-6995
Lone Wolf Development www.wolflair.com


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3ex...sNAA/WuQolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
rob is offline   #18 Reply With Quote
rob
Senior Member
Lone Wolf Staff
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 8,232

Old October 11th, 2003, 01:28 AM
And then some!! :-)

-Rob

At 12:27 AM 10/10/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>I know I've been doing my share :-P (5 datafiles and 6 skins under my belt)


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rob Bowes (rob@wolflair.com) (559) 658-6995
Lone Wolf Development www.wolflair.com


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Rent DVDs from home.
Over 14,500 titles. Free Shipping
& No Late Fees. Try Netflix for FREE!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/ArdFIC/hP....SFAA/WuQolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
rob is offline   #19 Reply With Quote
pyros at wizard.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Old October 11th, 2003, 01:47 AM
Woo! I know I'd love to update datafiles... There are a few games I
play that I'm pretty... well.. anal retentive about..

I like to keep all my stuff in order, I guess.

-Luke

>I know I've been doing my share :-P (5 datafiles and 6 skins under
>my belt)



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3ex...sNAA/WuQolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
  #20 Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Extra: Wide Gargula HL - Mutants & Masterminds 1 December 10th, 2008 06:11 AM
Extra Smiteing dartnet HL - d20 System 1 September 5th, 2007 03:35 PM
Extra Domains from SRD Bishop37 HL - d20 System 1 August 23rd, 2007 12:05 PM
Extra dartnet HL - d20 System 2 July 10th, 2007 12:45 PM
[inbox] Extra inventory tracking features Ralphey at mtgmelb.com Card Vault 2 October 9th, 2003 03:31 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
wolflair.com copyright ©1998-2016 Lone Wolf Development, Inc. View our Privacy Policy here.