Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ok. I'm the data file author for Lord of the Rings. I would appreciate any
comments on what users would like to have happen with the following. Due out real soon - meaning about 5-6 days - is the latest update for Lord of the Rings. It will be the first set of the War of the Ring block. It is called Shadows. This game is - incase you've been in a closet somewhere is produced by Decipher. The Set will be 266 cards. Instead of producing a parallel foil for the entire set, the big D in their infinite wisdom, has decided to only foil 18 of the cards in the set - I assume that will be from now on. In a further act of brilliance they have changed all the collectors info on the foiled cards so that it is not the same as the standard cards. example. Elven Marksmanship is card number 17 in the set and I have designated it as follows: Sdw11R17 which equates to Shadows (set #11), rare, card #17. The foil version of this card has been tagged by Decipher as 11RF2. Set #11 rare foil card 2. Normally - since there was ALMOST always a foil of each standard style card it was easy to just have both styles in the set and both cards had the same collectors info. The way I see it I can either ignore the foil number and just tag those 18 cards as having 2 styles - standard and foil, or I can create a Shadows Foil set of 18 with their own unique collectors info #s. Or - I suppose - if it were possible I could do a subset of the set - but I don't know if that is even possible. So I'm asking what the folks that will be using this data file might think. I'm quite frankly leaning towards just tagging those 18 cards as foils within the Shadows set, (I could put the collectors info for the foils in the notes section.) but I can honestly see where real hardcore collectors would like to see the original collectors info as a card in itself. If this needs to be clarified or made more understandable let me know, and I look forward to any comments/opinions you may have on the subject. Just so you know, the Return of the King Anthology and any new posted promo cards will be included in the update to the datafiles. Thanx Jim dizpatch1@verizon.net<mailto:dizpatch1@verizon.net> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar. Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free! http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSI...LSAA/WuQolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Jim Beszhak wrote:
>Sdw11R17 which equates to Shadows (set #11), rare, card #17. The foil >version of this card has been tagged by Decipher as 11RF2. Set #11 rare >foil card 2. > >Normally - since there was ALMOST always a foil of each standard style card >it was easy to just have both styles in the set and both cards had the same >collectors info. > > I had a similar situation with the Duelmasters files. Some of the cards were numbered differently between the English and Japanese versions. Rob had recommended the best way to handle this (since all the card info wasn't identical) was to use seperate records for each card. I also wouldn't worry about naming the foil cards differently (since you can show duplicate cards within cardvault anyway). Just let the users know what changes you made in the FAQ. -- Jim Williamson <jim@timewarpcomics.com <mailto:jim@timewarpcomics.com>> TimeWarp Comics & Games (973) 857-9788 www.timewarpcomics.com <http://www.timewarpcomics.com> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar. Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free! http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSI...LSAA/WuQolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Well, Decipher did the same thing with their new "WARS" CCG. In the files
I'm working on for it, I've separated the foils (3 different types) into their own files, using the collector's info for each one as listed, setting the styles as "foil" or "standard" as appropriate. I personally think it's better this way since the foils have their own collector's info. As a collector as well as a player, I'd rather be able to record separate cards like that. Mike DeCarlo [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar. Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free! http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSI...LSAA/WuQolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> |
#3 |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[inbox] a bit of a quandry | Ralphey at mtgmelb.com | Card Vault | 0 | November 1st, 2004 11:34 PM |