|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 7
|
This war a rather whiny post where I wrongly blamed a programmer for something he didn't do. Furthermore I was quite rude about.
I haved edited by request of a mod/admin. Not to hide my stupidity. Last edited by Carny; February 24th, 2014 at 09:07 AM. |
#1 |
Senior Member
Volunteer Data File Author
|
Can you please clarify your issue, what version of the files you are using and if you have visited the ab40k site to post a bug? The sm sergeant issue I thought was fixed and updated yesterday. Are you saying that didn't fix the issue, or are you saying the issue has reappeared?
The only "hobby" GW is interested in is lining their pockets with your money. |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 39
|
Fixed for me, thanks to the maintainer that did this for us. Don't use the Codex: Ultramarines file, use the Codex: Space Marines, I thought the same thing at first.
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Volunteer Data File Author
|
yes, I believe the oversight here is that the older codex versions are still active in the army list. I will point that out to see if they can be disabled since the Codex: Space Marine covers them.
The only "hobby" GW is interested in is lining their pockets with your money. |
#4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 7
|
Lets start:
First I am sorry. I am truly sorry about the misunderstanding. You are right that older versions might still be active. I misinterpreted the situation and overreacted. My post was rude and (in fact) rather childish. I hope you (the anonymous programmer) will accept my apology. Also note that at site admin has asked me to edit the post. I will do so, but it is not an attempted stealth edit. |
#5 |
|
|