Guest
Posts: n/a
|
i am not quite sure if this a fault or not but the vehicle design rules
might be flawed. The armour section has the increases for front side and rear and at the bottom it has an option total. Now is this suppose the reduce the price of the vehicle the more armour you put on??????????? Like its 20pts cheaper to have a total armour value of 50 then having a total of 35. That sists wrong in my mind but i don't have the rules so hey.... Kudos aka Derranged Brazilian Ghetto Chihuahua "There is more than two sides to a coin..." -Path of the Jester __________________________________________________ _______________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
--- In armybuilder@y..., "Jester /Black Mambo" <bondage__69er@h...>
wrote: > i am not quite sure if this a fault or not but the vehicle design rules > might be flawed. > > The armour section has the increases for front side and rear and at the > bottom it has an option total. > > Now is this suppose the reduce the price of the vehicle the more armour you > put on??????????? Like its 20pts cheaper to have a total armour value of 50 > then having a total of 35. > > That sists wrong in my mind but i don't have the rules so hey.... > I would suggest you pick up a copy of Codex Chapter Approved with the VDR rules because the AB files are correct. |
#2 |
|
|