View Single Post
Dark Lord Galen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 698

Old September 23rd, 2018, 09:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sendric View Post
kUserPts = 8
kUserRanks = 4

PS Sorry the table isn't cleaner. Let me know if it's confusing.
The table is good, I have become accustom to how herolab does similar things to a table ..hahah
On kUuserPts & KuserRanks, I would agree on the divisor to not duplicate the effect.. but I'm still confused as to why its bad to use KuserPts and ok to use KuserRanks? Would seem one is just "pre-class" adjusted and the other isn't?

Kendall's Approach is certainly streamlined to what I was hoping to do... I'm certain I was losing something in my ability to convey what my goal was in translation of "want to accomplish".

2e "skill checks" were fundamentally simpler than 3.5e since most all revolved around a check against the attribute itself. It just gets muddy when the checks are % based and vary based on progression or attribute change.. But hey at least its not a 1e conversion where they had 18/98 strength to factor heheh

@ Both
I do appreciate the help from both of you I'm am certainly at the consider me "dangerous" level of understanding in herolab code writing .. hehehe

D&D> Pre 1e White Box Edition, 1e, 2e, 3.5 Currently, Set in the World of Greyhawk (The first, longest running and Best Campaign Setting)
Software>Extensive use of all forms of MS Products, Visual Studio 2012, DAZ 3d, AutoCAD, Adobe Products.
Gaming Specific>Campaign Cartographer, D20 Pro Alpha & BattleGrounds Beta Tester, World Builder, Dungeon Crafter, LWD Hero Lab, Realm Works, Inkwell Ideas Citybuilder & Dungeon Builder, Auto-Realm, Dundjinni
Contributing Writer for TSR, WOC, & Canonfire
Dark Lord Galen is offline   #41 Reply With Quote