D'oh. Sorry I forgot to mention that last time. It was late and I was a
bit brain tired. I'm using ie6 on windows xp, all the latest updates and
patches. Here's a screenshot:
www.tigerknight.org/~tib/music/html-output.jpg
I found the issue I think. The footnotes table is 600 pixels wide, but
each individual cell for data only has a width of 100pixels. It's forcing
line wraps early. These cell level widths could just come out and it would
solve the problem.
Heck even the part that holds the text 'option footnotes' is only 200pix
wide for text. Why is it doing this? It would appear that my browser isn't
at fault. The v2 table code in html output doesn't have these cell level
width specifications, and I bet your browser ignores them altogether.
<EOL>
Tib
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Rob Bowes wrote:
>
> The problem is that they do NOT look that way to me. So the HTML looks
> different on your browser compared to mine. In order to figure that out, I
> need to (a) know the browser and version you're using, and (b) need some
> screen shots so that I can actually see what the output looks like for you.
>
> Please send the information to
support@wolflair.com.
>
> Thanks, Rob
>
> At 11:23 PM 2/15/2005 -0600, you wrote:
> >Actually I sorta like the option summary info being with the units on the
> >html output. My main issue was the footnotes section. On v2, the details
> >just go smoothly out to the end of the table box and then wrap to the next
> >line. on v3 they go a word or two and then break to a new line, another
> >word or two and break to a new line; giving you a massively long footnotes
> >section.
> >
> >On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Rob Bowes wrote:
> >
> > > First of all, the Options Summary info should NOT be included in the roster
> > > output. That's something that needs to be reported to the 40K data file
> > > authors as a bug. They need to setup a different default View for the
> > > roster output.
> >
> > >
> > > For the footnotes section, I don't see any substantive difference between
> > > the two HTML pages. They look perfectly fine to me. It's possible that my
> > > browser isn't picking up on something the same way yours is. Can you grab
> > > screen shots of the two different HTML pages and send them to us to
> > look at?
> > >
> > > Also, be sure to tell us what browser (including version) you are using. My
> > > guess is that your browser is not displaying the output the same way.
> > >
> > > -Rob
> > >
> > > At 04:27 PM 2/14/2005 -0600, you wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > >The html output between v2 and v3 is a bit odd. Here's two files that
> > > >illustrate the point.
> > > >
> > > >V2 html output:
> > > >
http://www.tigerknight.org/~tib/musi...t-2xfw-krt.htm
> > > >
> > > >V3 html output:
> > > >
http://www.tigerknight.org/~tib/music/tau750.htm
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Am I just missing some formatting instructions somewhere? Check out the
> > > >footnotes section where everything is on a new line and it looks pretty
> > > >horrendous. I tried going through the html/font/etc output options but
> > > >just didn't see anything .. hope I'm not being blind.
> > > >
> > > ><EOL>
> > > >Tib
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Rob Bowes (rob@wolflair.com) (650) 588-8252
> Lone Wolf Development
www.wolflair.com
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, email
>
>
armybuilder-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>