--- In cardvault@y..., Kuni Tetsu <kuni_tetsu@y...> wrote:
> Well, use "Mint" quality for the stuff in the binder, and a
different quality for the stuff you use to play.
>
Good idea but it doesn't work for me since many of my cards that I
play with are also mint quality. it makes extra book keeping which
is a real headache when you are talking about 50,000 cards. and that
does not include any sets newer than tempest.
> Hmmm... this would actually be fairly trivial to add as an
extension. All you have to do is read in the XML data from the deck,
and then output it as a csv file that will easily import into Excel.
If I was good enough with XML, you could likely do it with an XSL
sheet.
Interesting thought. I am a hardware propeller head tho and not a
software propeller head :-) Will have to look into learning the XML
stuff as a backup plan while I wait for the developers to weigh in.
>
> > That has to do with system overhead (assuming you have the same
processor speed > on both systems). As they say "Andy giveth, and
Bill taketh away." - Every > version of Windows consumes a
significantly greater amount of cycles to perform the same tasks
> Kuni Tetsu
> Clan War rules guy
> Moderator of ClanWar-l
Ahhh now here I can make a meaninful reply :-). I would tend to
agree with you if both machines were equal in processor and memory
but the XP machine is a dual 733 with 500MB of ram while the 98
machine is of lesser power (can't remember off the top of my head)
and only has 256 of RAM. I suspect there may be some optimizaiton
that can be done for XP but it is running good on 98 so I am a happy
camper.
Thanks for the input :-)
Chers, RDJ
> =====
>
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Sell a Home for Top $
http://us.click.yahoo.com/RrPZMC/jTm...fIAA/WuQolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->