Silveras |
May 21st, 2017 04:51 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadowChemosh
(Post 250345)
I am totally lost what your point is? I am very sorry but you seem to just be "summing" up information. :(
Can you be very clear to your point?
My main point is I DO NOT WANT multiple classes with the same name in HL. This will cause ridiculous levels of confusion to my players. Most HL users I deal with now refuse to even read a book or have a bood with the rules and only go by HL. So having "two" classes to pick from is going to confuse them. They will have NO WAY to know which version to use as most can't/don't track which book just came out or when.
Now lets add to the issue that from the past changes d20pfsrd will simply "update" the class text to the latest printing. This leads to more confusion if the text from d20pfsrd does not match HL. If the text abilities don't match they will complain to me to put in a bug report(s). Then I have to try and explain about books and versions and UG all I will get is a blank look of dear in headlights. :(
|
Yeah.. I wasn't clear. Sorry.
I was just summarizing in the end. I deleted a paragraph or two, or three, as I was composing... and my point got lost in the process.
The point: I agree. I am fairly sure that Paizo's policy is the same as WotC's was for 3.x (latest printed version is the one considered "correct"), and I think LWD should follow the same policy. I think it is a bad idea for LWD to try to present multiple versions, because that will cascade to become similar calls for every change made in errata or a FAQ by Paizo. Do it once, and you open the gates.
|